CO129-209 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [5] — Page 82

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

31. 80

under them hable, there women will also

fall under the sections applying surpaterea hollets.

42

14. The qucation of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unabic

to agree; and for its due consideration I

would moite Your Lordship's careful

Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordeiance 12 of 1857 by declion 4, the averment on bath

attention to rections 19 and 63 sie

athly live persons before the Magistrate

a house was occupied

us a bottel, 100 allowed to be received as aufficient lordince of the fact. This enactment was not

1867 ; but by the Erdmance 2° of that year the Jurisdiction was Cowayed to the Registrar. Eneral, who heard the cases in private . By Ordenance

N°. 2 of 1876 the pirisdiction was again Emoryed to the Magistrales, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if wither party objected, and wiltont the acristance of the above mentioned partes

His Section 4 of Ordinance 12

4/185 24/18577-

& Mis state of things that the present

difficulty of concorching "they" brothel reepers

allowed

However, to follow the instructions more closely and provide a more accurate output, here is the revised version with some corrections and formatting:

31. 80

Under them liable, there women will also

fall under the sections applying supraterritorial lets.

42

14. The question of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unable

to agree; and for its due consideration I

would moite Your Lordship's careful

Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordinance 12 of 1857 by section 4, the averment on oath

attention to sections 19 and 63 sie

athly live persons before the Magistrate

a house was occupied

as a brothel, was allowed to be received as sufficient evidence of the fact. This enactment was not

1867; but by the Ordinance 2 of that year the Jurisdiction was Conveyed to the Registrar General, who heard the cases in private. By Ordinance

No. 2 of 1876 the jurisdiction was again vested in the Magistrates, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if either party objected, and without the assistance of the above-mentioned partes

His Section 4 of Ordinance 12

4/1857 24/1857-

& Mis state of things that the present

difficulty of concorching "they" brothel keepers

allowed

Here is the HTML output with

tags.

31. 80

Under them liable, there women will also

fall under the sections applying supraterritorial lets.

42

14. The question of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unable
to agree; and for its due consideration I
would moite Your Lordship's careful

Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordinance 12 of 1857 by section 4, the averment on oath

attention to sections 19 and 63 sie
athly live persons before the Magistrate
a house was occupied
as a brothel, was allowed to be received as sufficient evidence of the fact. This enactment was not

1867; but by the Ordinance 2 of that year the Jurisdiction was Conveyed to the Registrar General, who heard the cases in private. By Ordinance
No. 2 of 1876 the jurisdiction was again vested in the Magistrates, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if either party objected, and without the assistance of the above-mentioned partes

His Section 4 of Ordinance 12
4/1857 24/1857-

& Mis state of things that the present
difficulty of concorching "they" brothel keepers
allowed

Edit History

2026-05-23 06:19:12 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
31. 80 under them hable, there women will also fall under the sections applying surpaterea hollets. 42 14. The qucation of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unabic to agree; and for its due consideration I would moite Your Lordship's careful Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordeiance 12 of 1857 by declion 4, the averment on bath attention to rections 19 and 63 sie athly live persons before the Magistrate a house was occupied us a bottel, 100 allowed to be received as aufficient lordince of the fact. This enactment was not 1867 ; but by the Erdmance 2° of that year the Jurisdiction was Cowayed to the Registrar. Eneral, who heard the cases in private . By Ordenance N°. 2 of 1876 the pirisdiction was again Emoryed to the Magistrales, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if wither party objected, and wiltont the acristance of the above mentioned partes His Section 4 of Ordinance 12 4/185 24/18577- & Mis state of things that the present difficulty of concorching "they" brothel reepers allowed However, to follow the instructions more closely and provide a more accurate output, here is the revised version with some corrections and formatting: 31. 80 Under them liable, there women will also fall under the sections applying supraterritorial lets. 42 14. The question of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unable to agree; and for its due consideration I would moite Your Lordship's careful Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordinance 12 of 1857 by section 4, the averment on oath attention to sections 19 and 63 sie athly live persons before the Magistrate a house was occupied as a brothel, was allowed to be received as sufficient evidence of the fact. This enactment was not 1867; but by the Ordinance 2 of that year the Jurisdiction was Conveyed to the Registrar General, who heard the cases in private. By Ordinance No. 2 of 1876 the jurisdiction was again vested in the Magistrates, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if either party objected, and without the assistance of the above-mentioned partes His Section 4 of Ordinance 12 4/1857 24/1857- & Mis state of things that the present difficulty of concorching "they" brothel keepers allowed Here is the HTML output with tags. 31. 80 Under them liable, there women will also fall under the sections applying supraterritorial lets. 42 14. The question of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unableto agree; and for its due consideration Iwould moite Your Lordship's careful Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordinance 12 of 1857 by section 4, the averment on oath attention to sections 19 and 63 sieathly live persons before the Magistratea house was occupiedas a brothel, was allowed to be received as sufficient evidence of the fact. This enactment was not 1867; but by the Ordinance 2 of that year the Jurisdiction was Conveyed to the Registrar General, who heard the cases in private. By OrdinanceNo. 2 of 1876 the jurisdiction was again vested in the Magistrates, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if either party objected, and without the assistance of the above-mentioned partes His Section 4 of Ordinance 124/1857 24/1857- & Mis state of things that the presentdifficulty of concorching "they" brothel keepersallowed
Baseline (Original)
31. 80 under them hable, there women will also fall under the sections applying surpaterea hollets. 42 14. The qucation of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unabic to agree; and for its due consideration I i would moite Your Lordship's careful Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordeiance 12 of 1857 by declion 4, the averment on bath attention to rections 19 and 63 sie athly live persons before the Magistrate thish a house was occupied us a bottel, 100 allowed to be received as aufficient lordince of the fact. This enactment was not 1867 ; but by the Erdmance 2° Whewld Mi 10 of that year the Jurisdiction was Cowayed to the Registrar. Eneral, who heard the cases in private . By Ordenance N°. 2 of 1876 the pirisdiction was again Emoryed to the Magistrales, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if wither party objected, and wiltont the acristance of the above mentioned partes His Section 4 of Ordinance 12 4/185 24/18577- & Mis state of things that the present difficulty of concorching "they" brothel reepers allowed
2026-05-23 06:19:12 · Baseline
View content

31. 80

under them hable, there women will also

fall under the sections applying surpaterea hollets.

42

14. The qucation of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unabic

to agree; and for its due consideration I

i

would moite Your Lordship's careful

Inclosure

1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordeiance 12 of 1857 by declion 4, the averment on bath

attention to rections 19 and 63 sie

athly

live persons before the Magistrate thish

a

house was occupied

us a

bottel, 100

allowed to be received as aufficient lordince

of the fact. This enactment was not

1867 ; but by the Erdmance 2°

Whewld Mi

10 of that year the Jurisdiction was Cowayed to the Registrar. Eneral, who heard the cases in private . By Ordenance

N°. 2 of 1876 the pirisdiction was again Emoryed to the Magistrales, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if wither party objected, and wiltont the acristance of the above mentioned partes

His

Section 4 of Ordinance 12

4/185 24/18577-

& Mis state of things that the present

difficulty of concorching "they" brothel reepers

allowed

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.